Recommended by H.265 / HEVC video compression standard Compared to H.264 / AVC saves about 50% of the bandwidth program

Recently, friends asked me if H265 is more suitable for transmission on public online. I will borrow a flower to offer Buddhas, and I have to give up such a recommended blog. I hope everyone likes. BBC measured: H.265 is saved more than H.264 to the deployment of the future UHD content. After a more detailed test, H.265 / HEVC video compression standard compared to H.264 / AVC, indeed brought a bigger Compression ratio, significantly saving bandwidth. The research team was mainly tested for UHD ultra HD content, and the results found that the code rate saved up to 50%. H.265 is 50% less code rate than H.264 Since people are now growing more and more, more and more content is broadcast through the line stream media, plus high quality, ultra HD resource demand is also increased, and the efficiency is higher. The video compression method is obviously important. In 2013, H.265 has been moved to the stage, and the peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) is provided as a reference to provide a significant rate of code rates in H.264. The latest test also verifies the actual performance of H.265. The R & D team stated that this is mainly due to "Coding Block) size and shape, and the advanced predictive algorithm supports more encoding mode." This test is a video that views various resolutions, including UHD (3840x2160 and 4096x2048), 1080P (1920x1080), 720P (1280x720), and 480P (832x480), with a frame rate of 30Hz, 50Hz, and 60Hz. In the test results, BBC said: "Test verification of HEVC greatly improved in compression efficiency, confirmed the result of adopting objective quality indicators (based on PSNR) in the past report. In fact, compared to PSNR, using subjective MOS (Mean Opinion Scores) measure HEVC compared to AVC as a more advantageous advantage. With this subjective quality indicator, the overall average code rate of AVC and HEVC saves up to 59%, while the results on objective quality indicators are 44%. It is worth mentioning that a larger image size is more likely to save more, which is very meaningful for the deployment of the future UHD content. " ENC5 encoder powerful H265 algorithm Through the first section, you have clearly understood that the H265 is transmitted over the network than the H264 more bandwidth. Next I will recommend an encoder, it is called Enc5, which uses Haisi Hi3531DV100 chip, equipment reference link: https: // Item.taobao.com/Item.htm?spm=a2OQ0.12575281.0.0.3c761debhn8s1a&ft=t&ft=t&ief=61902947575 The technical parameters are as follows: It can be seen from the above parameters, supporting H264 and H265, so for the bandwidth requirements, the relatively harsh friends are blessed, and the local H264 decoding can be implemented by this device, and then encoded with H265 in public transmission. I hope this recommendation can help those friends who are still looking for H264 turn H265. Thank you for your support and encouragement, write a recommendation is also very good, and pay more attention to me!